Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
L'Amoreaux North Park, site photograph
Back to map
Waterfront Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Steeles (116)confidence moderate

L'Amoreaux North Park

Waterfront Park, in the top tier overall (score 44, rank ~87th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: edge activation.

Photo by Kam Wong via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

L'Amoreaux North Park scores 43.9 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and natural comfort. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (72). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forwaterfront recreationlong walks

Area · 26.83 ha

Vitality Score
44/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
43.9 / 100
Citywide
87th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Waterfront Park
91st
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
35
median in very large Waterfront Park waterfront (n=44)
Performance gap
+9
raw − expected · context confidence high
modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
L'Amoreaux North Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Explain this score

Where did the 44 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p24
-12.5
Connectivity78 · p98
+5.7
Natural Comfort71 · p85
+3.2
Border Vacuum Risk72 (risk)
-2.2
Amenity Diversity40 · p99
-2.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park68 · p64
+1.8

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

L'Amoreaux North Park works because its amenity diversity score (40) is one of the city's strongest and its connectivity (78) is also top decile.

What limits this park

L'Amoreaux North Park is held back by edge activation (0, bottom quartile): the surrounding streets carry too few active uses to spill into the park; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (72).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (40, top decile).

Jacobs reading

L'Amoreaux North Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (68) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0): frame without animation.
  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (72): much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Performance in context

  • A modest overperformer for its waterfront park typology (+9 vs the median in very large Waterfront Park waterfront).

Typology classification

confidence 85%
Waterfront Parkalso reads as Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Waterfront Park: 8% water surface inside park. Secondary read: Ravine / Naturalized Park (66% ravine overlap, 26% canopy).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 15 active uses (transit_stop, restaurant, community, cafe) and 10 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
78.4 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 56 mapped paths/walkways and 127 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 23 street intersections within 100 m; 26 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 18 estimated access points across ~2,796 m of perimeter. moderate edge density, small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m14
Intersections within 100 m23
Paths/walkways (50 m)56
Sidewalk segments (50 m)127
Transit stops (400 m)26
Estimated entrances18
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.50
Park perimeter2,796 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
39.8 / 100

5 distinct amenity types in the park (basketball, community_centre, dog_area, sports_field, washroom). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
71.3 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 26.4% estimated tree canopy; 65.9% inside the ravine system; 7.7% water surface; 95 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (3.5/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage26.4%
Canopy area7.09 ha
Inside ravine system65.9%
Water surface inside park7.7%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green92.3%
City-mapped trees inside polygon95
Tree density3.5 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)75.0
Sample points used299

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
67.6 / 100

309 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (13 mid-rise, 294 low-rise, 2 tower); avg edge height 6.4 m (~2 floors); 11.1 buildings per 100 m of 2,796 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); 2 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 13 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m309
Buildings within 50 m309
Avg edge height6.4 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building45.7 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)13
Low-rise (< 3 floors)294
Towers (≥ 13 floors)2
Frontage density11.05 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge4%
Tower share of edge1%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter2,796 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
72.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (5 types · 5 records)

  • basketball
  • community centre
  • dog area
  • sports field
  • washroom

Nearby active-edge features (31)

  • community: L’Amoreaux Community Recreation Centre0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • transit stop: Birchmount Road at Opposite Walkway to Ambercroft Boulevard4 m
  • transit stop4 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Silver Springs Blvd6 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Silver Springs Blvd21 m
  • transit stop: Birchmount Road at Walkway to Ambercroft Boulevard22 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Morbank Dr26 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Kennedy Ave27 m
  • cafe: CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice35 m
  • restaurant: Pit Stop Tropical Restaurant37 m
  • parking lot41 m
  • parking lot42 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Kennedy Ave44 m
  • transit stop: Kennedy Ave at McNicoll Ave55 m
  • transit stop: 3223 Kennedy Road57 m
  • parking lot63 m
  • transit stop: Kennedy Ave at McNicoll Ave67 m
  • parking lot70 m
  • transit stop: McNicoll Ave at Morbank Dr71 m
  • parking lot94 m
  • parking lot94 m
  • retail: Kitchenware Outlet105 m
  • parking lot117 m
  • parking lot136 m
  • parking lot150 m
  • parking lot156 m
  • parking lot174 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureL'Amoreaux North Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    87th
  • Edge activation
    24th
  • Connectivity
    98th
  • Amenity diversity
    99th
  • Natural comfort
    85th
  • Enclosure
    64th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match

“Wooded park featuring a large pond & hiking/biking trails, plus an off-leash area for dogs.” (Google editorial summary)

Visitor signal score54 / 100
53.9 / 100

p74 citywide · p74 within Waterfront Park

Volume (saturated)56
Density / ha19
Rating contribution85
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.4
out of 5
Ratings collected
647
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (0.98 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of L'Amoreaux North Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.