Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Felstead Avenue Playground, site photograph
Back to map
Neighbourhood Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Greenwood-Coxwell (65)confidence moderate

Felstead Avenue Playground

Neighbourhood Park, in the top tier overall (score 47, rank ~92th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.

Photo by Glen Farrelly via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Felstead Avenue Playground scores 46.8 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (14.3). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily urban life

Area · 1.70 ha

Vitality Score
47/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
46.8 / 100
Citywide
91st
of all 3,273 parks
Among Neighbourhood Park
89th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
37
median in medium Neighbourhood Park (n=363)
Performance gap
+9
raw − expected · context confidence high
modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Felstead Avenue Playground, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Explain this score

Where did the 47 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation14 · p73
-8.9
Amenity Diversity21 · p91
-5.8
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Connectivity70 · p90
+3.9
Enclosure / Eyes on Park84 · p89
+3.4
Natural Comfort45 · p50
-0.7

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Felstead Avenue Playground works because its amenity diversity score (21) is in the top tier and its connectivity (70) is also top decile.

What limits this park

Felstead Avenue Playground doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (21, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Felstead Avenue Playground sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (84) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 14): frame without animation.

Performance in context

  • A modest overperformer for its neighbourhood park typology (+9 vs the median in medium Neighbourhood Park).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Neighbourhood Park

Classified as Neighbourhood Park: 1.7 ha, framed by 26 mid-rise vs 0 towers

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
14.3 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 1 active uses (retail) and 0 dead/hostile uses (none). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
69.6 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 11 mapped paths/walkways and 12 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 18 street intersections within 100 m; 18 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 4 estimated access points across ~611 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m15
Intersections within 100 m18
Paths/walkways (50 m)11
Sidewalk segments (50 m)12
Transit stops (400 m)18
Estimated entrances4
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter2.46
Park perimeter611 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
21.0 / 100

2 distinct amenity types in the park (playground, washroom). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
45.2 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~8.6% effective canopy (5.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~958 m; 21 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (12.3/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage5.0%
Canopy area0.09 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)958 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon21
Tree density12.3 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)28.8
Sample points used119

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
83.6 / 100

140 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (26 mid-rise, 114 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.7 m (~3 floors); 22.9 buildings per 100 m of 611 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 26 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m140
Buildings within 50 m140
Avg edge height7.7 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building22.0 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)26
Low-rise (< 3 floors)114
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density22.93 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge19%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter611 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (2 types · 2 records)

  • playground
  • washroom

Nearby active-edge features (49)

  • retail: family mini mart49 m
  • parking lot104 m
  • transit stop: Mountnoel Avenue107 m
  • transit stop: Felstead Avenue113 m
  • parking lot123 m
  • transit stop: Mountnoel Avenue124 m
  • transit stop: Felstead Avenue129 m
  • parking lot153 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons165 m
  • restaurant: Good Vibes Kitchen166 m
  • retail: Circle K167 m
  • cafe: Jimma Coffee168 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue168 m
  • restaurant: Cosmic Pizza & Donair170 m
  • transit stop: Linnsmore Crescent171 m
  • retail: Fone Tech Solutions172 m
  • retail: MGH Variety174 m
  • retail176 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue177 m
  • restaurant: Sala184 m
  • retail: Greenwood Market184 m
  • restaurant: Blue Nile185 m
  • retail: Pinpoint Auto Centre185 m
  • retail: Alexander Custom Tailor185 m
  • retail186 m
  • retail: Hooked186 m
  • restaurant: Mango Sushi186 m
  • cafe: Ariam Cafe187 m
  • retail: 69 Vape Shop188 m
  • restaurant: The Dylan Bar188 m
  • retail: Omdurman House Convenience Store188 m
  • restaurant: Dahlak Lounge188 m
  • restaurant: Morgans on the Danforth189 m
  • restaurant: Asmera189 m
  • restaurant: Eastenders190 m
  • restaurant: Borrel191 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue191 m
  • restaurant: Vision Lounge192 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue192 m
  • retail: One Last Thing192 m
  • restaurant: Mocha193 m
  • restaurant: Subway193 m
  • rail194 m
  • restaurant: Bella Sports Bar195 m
  • transit stop: Danforth Avenue195 m
  • transit stop: Linnsmore Crescent196 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue196 m
  • restaurant: Linsmore Tavern196 m
  • retail: Treasure Bin Liquidation197 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureFelstead Avenue Playground
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    92th
  • Edge activation
    73th
  • Connectivity
    90th
  • Amenity diversity
    91th
  • Natural comfort
    50th
  • Enclosure
    89th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match
Visitor signal score48 / 100
47.7 / 100

p61 citywide · p68 within Neighbourhood Park

Volume (saturated)22
Density / ha45
Rating contribution85
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.4
out of 5
Ratings collected
139
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (0.95 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Felstead Avenue Playgroundmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.