Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Bloor St E - Open Green Space, site photograph
Back to map
Ravine / Naturalized Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (ravine-leaning)Rosedale-Moore Park (98)confidence moderate

Bloor St E - Open Green Space

Ravine / Naturalized Park, below average overall (score 30, rank ~28th percentile). Strongest: natural comfort; weakest: edge activation.

Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Bloor St E - Open Green Space scores 29.5 / 100. Strongest dimensions: natural comfort and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forescape into natureshaded summer use

Area · 0.32 ha

Vitality Score
30/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 61%

Data Confidence
29.5 / 100
Citywide
28th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Ravine / Naturalized Park
29th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
32
median in small Ravine / Naturalized Park ravine (n=200)
Performance gap
-3
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Explain this score

Where did the 30 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p10
-12.5
Amenity Diversity0 · p16
-10.0
Natural Comfort90 · p99
+6.0
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park64 · p55
+1.4
Connectivity48 · p51
-0.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Bloor St E - Open Green Space works because its natural comfort score (90) is one of the city's strongest (86% tree canopy provides real shade; it sits inside the ravine system).

What limits this park

Bloor St E - Open Green Space is held back by edge activation (0, bottom quartile): the surrounding streets carry too few active uses to spill into the park; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (100).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high natural comfort (90, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Bloor St E - Open Green Space sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • Natural comfort (90) significantly outpaces connectivity (48): restorative but hard to reach for daily use.
  • The park is enclosed by buildings (64) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0): frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 75%
Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Ravine / Naturalized Park: 86% ravine overlap, 86% canopy

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 1 active uses (transit_stop) and 9 dead/hostile uses (highway, rail). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
48.1 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 9 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 7 street intersections within 100 m; 8 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~308 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m6
Intersections within 100 m7
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)9
Transit stops (400 m)8
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter1.95
Park perimeter308 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded. Score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 60%
90.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 86.4% estimated tree canopy; 86.4% inside the ravine system; nearest waterbody ~192 m; 4 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (4.0/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage86.4%
Canopy area0.27 ha
Inside ravine system86.4%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)192 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon4
Tree density4.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)100.0
Sample points used22

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
64.1 / 100

9 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (2 mid-rise, 7 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.9 m (~3 floors); 2.9 buildings per 100 m of 308 m perimeter (moderate frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 2 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m9
Buildings within 50 m9
Avg edge height7.9 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building12.8 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)2
Low-rise (< 3 floors)7
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density2.92 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge22%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)3%
Park perimeter308 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Bloor Street East, Bloor Street East, Bayview-Bloor Ramp, Bloor-Danforth Line, Bloor-Danforth Line. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (27)

  • highway: Bloor Street East15 m
  • highway: Bayview-Bloor Ramp20 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line21 m
  • highway: Bloor Street East21 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line24 m
  • highway: Drumsnab Road61 m
  • highway: Bloor Street East72 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank Road74 m
  • highway: Castle Frank Road86 m
  • highway: Castle Frank Road88 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank Road109 m
  • parking lot117 m
  • highway: Bloor Street East118 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank Road124 m
  • highway: Bloor Street East156 m
  • rail: Rosedale Siding158 m
  • rail: GO Transit - Bala Subdivision162 m
  • highway: Bayview-Bloor Ramp163 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank171 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line171 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank171 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line171 m
  • transit stop: Castle Frank184 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line194 m
  • rail: Bloor-Danforth Line195 m
  • highway: Bloor Street East196 m
  • transit stop: Bloor Street199 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureBloor St E - Open Green Space
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    28th
  • Edge activation
    10th
  • Connectivity
    51th
  • Amenity diversity
    16th
  • Natural comfort
    99th
  • Enclosure
    55th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Bloor St E - Open Green Spacematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.