Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Glasgow Parkette, site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Kensington-Chinatown (78)confidence moderate

Glasgow Parkette

Urban Plaza, one of the city's strongest overall (score 53, rank ~98th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: amenity diversity.

Photo by Michael M via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Glasgow Parkette scores 53.4 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and edge activation. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.00 ha

Vitality Score
53/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 54%

Data Confidence
53.4 / 100
Citywide
98th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Urban Plaza
95th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
36
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=337)
Performance gap
+17
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Glasgow Parkette, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Explain this score

Where did the 53 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity0 · p34
-10.0
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park97 · p99
+4.7
Edge Activation65 · p99
+3.8
Connectivity49 · p54
-0.1
Natural Comfort50 · p60
+0.0

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Glasgow Parkette works because its enclosure score (97) is one of the city's strongest and its edge activation (65) is also top decile (18 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).

What limits this park

Glasgow Parkette is held back by amenity diversity (0, below-average).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high enclosure (97, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Glasgow Parkette is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (71) and meaningful natural comfort (65). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 53 versus an expected 36 for similar parks (pocket Urban Plaza) (gap +17).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 47 m², paved (0% canopy), 61.0 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
65.3 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 26 active uses (restaurant, retail) and 2 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
49.4 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 6 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 14 street intersections within 100 m; 11 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~31 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m3
Intersections within 100 m14
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)6
Transit stops (400 m)11
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.00
Park perimeter31 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded. Score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Natural Comfort requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Treed Area / Ravine / Waterbodies / Street Trees). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon0
Tree density0.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used2

Source: Treed Area / Ravine / Waterbodies / Street Trees

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
96.8 / 100

61 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (18 mid-rise, 41 low-rise, 2 tower); avg edge height 10.6 m (~4 floors); 61.0 buildings per 100 m of 31 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are at a Jacobs-scale walkable mid-rise (3 to 7 floors); 2 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 18 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m61
Buildings within 50 m61
Avg edge height10.6 m (~4 floors)
Tallest edge building77.9 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)18
Low-rise (< 3 floors)41
Towers (≥ 13 floors)2
Frontage density61.00 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge30%
Tower share of edge3%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter31 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • retail: J Hair61 m
  • retail: Nail Diary Studio61 m
  • retail: Reiwatakiya62 m
  • retail: Han Bingo62 m
  • restaurant: Kokumi Mini Hot Pot64 m
  • restaurant: A1 Stone Pot64 m
  • retail: In Fashion64 m
  • retail: XOXO Tea65 m
  • retail: Play De Record65 m
  • retail: Collective66 m
  • restaurant: Jian Bing Club67 m
  • restaurant: Crimson Teas68 m
  • retail: Gao Jun Chinese Arts & Crafts Center70 m
  • restaurant: Spice & Aroma70 m
  • parking lot72 m
  • retail: Yogo Yugurt73 m
  • restaurant: Kung Fu Duck75 m
  • restaurant: Anh Dao75 m
  • restaurant: Sizzler Kabab78 m
  • restaurant: Mother's Dumplings79 m
  • restaurant: Tasty's Restaurant & Catering79 m
  • parking lot81 m
  • retail: Lucky's Trading Co. Ltd.84 m
  • retail: 180° Smoke Vape Store85 m
  • retail: Tankx E-bike89 m
  • restaurant: Korean Grillhouse93 m
  • restaurant: Grossman's Tavern96 m
  • restaurant: Qin's Garden100 m
  • retail: Cozy Grotto103 m
  • retail: Furonto Impex106 m
  • retail: Cotton Best107 m
  • retail: Maga T-shirt Warehouse107 m
  • restaurant: Hungking108 m
  • restaurant: Song Tea109 m
  • restaurant: Canton Chili110 m
  • retail: Sahar110 m
  • restaurant: Bank Bao111 m
  • restaurant: Xiaobiandan112 m
  • restaurant: Chongqing Chicken Hot Pot112 m
  • retail: JJ international113 m
  • retail: Super Vape113 m
  • retail: Emmo113 m
  • retail: Daniel's Art Supplies113 m
  • restaurant: Flaming Noodles114 m
  • retail: Toronto Hair Care114 m
  • restaurant: Thai Country Kitchen115 m
  • restaurant: Pizza Nova115 m
  • cafe: CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice117 m
  • restaurant: New Ho King117 m
  • restaurant: A Sezchuan Restaurant117 m
  • parking lot117 m
  • retail: Elsa Fashions121 m
  • restaurant: Red Lounge121 m
  • retail: House of Mush!122 m
  • restaurant: Yin Ji Chang Fen123 m
  • transit stop: College Street123 m
  • restaurant: Panera Bread123 m
  • retail: Tech Source123 m
  • restaurant: Popeyes124 m
  • retail: Gotcha125 m
  • retail: Gwartzman127 m
  • restaurant: Krispy Kreme128 m
  • community: YSM Evergreen Centre129 m
  • restaurant: Taco Bell129 m
  • retail: Shawarma Max131 m
  • parking lot131 m
  • retail: Creeps132 m
  • retail: A&C Games133 m
  • retail: Net Plaza135 m
  • restaurant: Simmer Huang136 m
  • transit stop: Nassau Street136 m
  • restaurant: GoGrill136 m
  • restaurant: Burger King138 m
  • restaurant: Ramen Station138 m
  • restaurant: Subway138 m
  • parking lot140 m
  • restaurant: Tahini's142 m
  • cafe: Honeymoon Dessert142 m
  • restaurant: Fortune-King Hotpot142 m
  • restaurant: ChiChop x norigo143 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureGlasgow Parkette
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    98th
  • Edge activation
    99th
  • Connectivity
    54th
  • Amenity diversity
    34th
  • Natural comfort
    60th
  • Enclosure
    99th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

Visitor signal score46 / 100
46.2 / 100

p58 citywide · p53 within Urban Plaza

Volume (saturated)3
Density / ha75
Rating contribution75
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.0
out of 5
Ratings collected
15
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match unverified (0.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Glasgow Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.